Skip to content

Legal Dispute Between Cards Against Humanity and SpaceX in South Texas

Legal Dispute Between Cards Against Humanity and SpaceX in South Texas

South Texas witnessed a unique legal dispute between the popular game company Cards Against Humanity and Elon Musk’s SpaceX. A piece of land owned by Cards Against Humanity was used to store heavy equipment and construction materials belonging to SpaceX without prior permission, leading to legal action.

Beginning of the Legal Dispute

The dispute began when Cards Against Humanity discovered that SpaceX was storing its heavy equipment and construction materials on a piece of land it owned in South Texas, near SpaceX’s manufacturing and launch facility. This land had been purchased in 2017 by a group of supporters who wanted to stop the construction of a border wall between the United States and Mexico.

Cards Against Humanity decided to take legal steps and filed a lawsuit seeking damages of up to $15 million for trespassing and damage to the land. This dispute was part of a larger project known as “Cards Against Humanity Saves America.”

Final Settlement

A settlement was reached between the parties before the scheduled trial date of November 3, 2024. Under this settlement, SpaceX agreed to remove its equipment from the land and work with a local company to rehabilitate the land and restore it to its natural state.

The full financial details of the settlement were not disclosed, but Cards Against Humanity indicated that most of the funds received would be allocated to rehabilitating the land, and project contributors would not be able to recover significant amounts.

Reactions and Future Actions

Cards Against Humanity expressed disappointment at not being able to fully compensate contributors but resorted to offering a special card pack about Elon Musk as a symbolic compensation for contributors. These cards reflect the humor and boldness characteristic of the company.

On the other hand, SpaceX stated that it was unaware that the use of the land was unauthorized and had taken steps to remove the equipment and prevent such incidents in the future.

Conclusion

This dispute highlights how property rights disagreements can lead to complex legal battles, especially involving large companies like SpaceX. Although the settlement was not perfect for everyone, it represents a step towards resolving the dispute and rehabilitating the damaged land. The hope remains that this incident will serve as a lesson for companies on the importance of verifying property rights and land use before embarking on any projects.